In this post, I will start down the path of implementing the basics of a Z-Machine. The focus here is making sure there is understanding of exactly what a Z-Machine is, at a fundamental level.
Continue reading The Ontology of GrueSetting up the Grue
In this post, I’ll cover getting set up to develop the Grue Z-Machine implementation. By the end of this post, the goal is to have the start of a working project.
Continue reading Setting up the GrueContext for the Grue
In this post, I’ll give you an idea of how the Grue project is set up, which involves discussing the programming language and ecosystem to be used. This is the kind of information that, as a tester, I like to know. Indeed, these details matter for anyone looking to develop a Z-Machine implementation.
Continue reading Context for the GrueEaten By A Grue
For the duration, this blog will move in a slightly different direction than it has in the past. I’ll use this oddly titled post to explain what that means and why that is. By the end of the post, the title won’t seem so odd. And even if it still seems odd, it will at least be understandable.
Continue reading Eaten By A GrueScrutinize, Stabilize, Sustain
A lot of talk in the testing industry still focus on that divide between “automation” and “manual testing.” A lot of talk also focuses around how much and to what extent developers do testing. Here I want to provide a short post that indicates what I’ve done in my career, either as an individual contributor, a manager of teams, or a director.
Continue reading Scrutinize, Stabilize, SustainReframing Testing Arguments
I was giving a presentation to developers as well as engineering hiring managers who make decisions around hiring test practitioners. This came about regarding recent decisions in hiring, or rather, lack thereof. Brought up to me numerous times was the idea that testers are not being hired if they even hinted at the idea of testing as distinct from checking. So let’s talk about this. Continue reading Reframing Testing Arguments
The Social Dimension of Testing
I’ve talked in the past about my perception that specialist testers need to be cross-discipline associative. And while I’ve implicitly given some ideas about what that means in various posts, here I want to be a bit more explicit. Continue reading The Social Dimension of Testing
AI-Powered Testing: Exploring and Exploiting with Reinforcement
There’s a lot of talk out there about using large language models to help testers write tests, such as coming up with scenarios. There’s also talk out there about AI based tools actually doing the testing. Writing tests and executing tests are both a form of performing testing. So let’s talk about what this means in a human and an AI context. Continue reading AI-Powered Testing: Exploring and Exploiting with Reinforcement
What Actually Is Testing?
One thing that’s often interesting is to define foundational terms within your discipline. It’s often even more interesting when you come across a discipline that seems to struggle with doing so. Is that the case for testing? Well, let’s talk about it. Continue reading What Actually Is Testing?
My Role as Quality and Test Specialist
I often frame whatever role I’m in as a Quality and Test Specialist. It’s not really a term or phrase that our industry agrees upon. Normally people want the word “Engineer” somewhere in their title as if that term somehow wasn’t terribly vague. So let’s dig in to what I mean when I talk about being a specialist. Continue reading My Role as Quality and Test Specialist
Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 6
In this final post of this series, we’ll look at training our learning model on our Emotions dataset. This post is the culmination of everything we’ve learned in the first three posts in this series and then implemented in the previous two posts in this series. So let’s dig in for the final stretch! Continue reading Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 6
Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 5
This post, and the following, will bring together everything we’ve learned in the previous four posts in this text classification series. Here we’re going to use the Emotions dataset we looked at in the last post and feed it to a model. Continue reading Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 5
Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 4
In this post, we’re going to look at the Emotions dataset that we briefly investigated in the previous post. Here we’re going to consider the basis of that dataset. Then we’ll load it up and see if what we have to do in order to feed the data to a training model. Continue reading Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 4
Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 3
In this post, we’ll explore some particular datasets. The focus here is just to get a feel for what can be presented to you and what’s available for you to use. We’ll do a little bit of code in this post to get you used to how to load a dataset. Continue reading Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 3
Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 2
Here we’ll continue on directly from the first post where we were learning the fundamentals of dealing with text that we plan to send to a learning model. Our focus was on the tokenization and encoding of the text. These are fundamentals that I’ll reinforce further in this post. Continue reading Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 2
Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 1
Let’s start this “Thinking About AI” series by thinking about the idea of classifying text. Classifying, broadly speaking, relates to testing quite well. This is because, at its core, the idea of classification focuses on categorization of data and decision making based on data. More broadly, as humans, we tend to classify everything by some categories. Continue reading Text Trek: Navigating Classifications, Part 1
The Very Idea of Test Cases
Most testers are aware of the idea of a “test case.” What people outside of testing often don’t know is how much debate can swirl around what a test case is or should be. I think it’s great to have discussions about this kind of thing but I also find that there can be a temptation to either simplify it too much or complicate it too much. Continue reading The Very Idea of Test Cases
Thinking About AI
Many are debating the efficacy of artificial intelligence as it relates to the practice and craft of testing. Perhaps not surprisingly, the loudest voices tend to be the ones who have the least experience with the technology beyond just playing around with ChatGPT here and there and making broad pronouncements, both for and against. We need to truly start thinking about AI critically and not just reacting to it if we want those with a quality and test specialty to have relevance in this context. Continue reading Thinking About AI
Keeping People in Computing
Following on from computing eras but before getting to my “Thinking About AI” series, there’s one intersection I’d like to bring up which is the notion of “people’s computing.” This idea of people being front-and-center of computation, and thus technology, once held sway but has often been in danger from a wider technocracy. Continue reading Keeping People in Computing
Computing and Crucible Eras
This post will be a bit of a divergence from my normal posting style although very much in line with the idea of stories that take place in my testing career. Continue reading Computing and Crucible Eras